Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal
Articles Information
Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal, Vol.5, No.3, Sep. 2019, Pub. Date: Sep. 6, 2019
Effect of Different Irrigation Techniques, Soil Depth, Location Along the Furrow and Furrow end Condition on Soil Moisture Content
Pages: 88-97 Views: 185 Downloads: 103
[01] Abdelmoneim Elamin Mohamed, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Shambat, Sudan.
[02] Abdelrhman Mohamed Nour Hamid, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology and Fish Sciences, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.
[03] Mohmed Abdallah Mohmed Abdalhi, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology and Fish Sciences, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.
[04] Nahla Omer Abdeen, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Shambat, Sudan.
The study was conducted to determine the soil moisture content down the profile and along the furrow run. In addition to evaluate the furrow irrigation under four irrigation techniques (surge flow, bunds, cut-back and cut-off). The techniques were applied on free end furrows and dyked end furrows. The results indicated that, irrigation techniques, soil depths, locations along the furrow and their interactions were found to have highly significant effects on soil moisture content on depth basis at (P ≤ 0.01). Whereas, the interaction of soil depth and furrow end conditions had no significant effects on soil moisture content. Surge technique resulted in significantly high moisture content at the two furrow end conditions, followed by bund, cut-back and cut-off technique. The results also showed that the highest application efficiency of 60.29% was obtained with surge irrigation technique with dyked furrow end (at P ≤ 0.05) and the lowest application efficiency of 29.21% was obtained by cut-off irrigation technique with free end furrow. Surge technique resulted with highest values in all tested efficiencies within the dyked end and free end furrows compared to all other combinations.
Irrigation Techniques, Soil Depth, Moisture Content, Furrow End, Cut-back
[01] Hart WE, Collins HG, Woodward G, Humpherys AS. 1980. Design and operation of gravity or surface irrigation. In Design and Operation of Farm Irrigation Systems. (ed. M. I. Jensen), 501-580. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Michigan.
[02] Walker WR. 1989. Guidance for Design and Evaluating Surface Irrigation Systems: FAO, Irrigation and Drainage, Rome, Italy, 45, 3-80.
[03] Wang J, Huang Q, Huang J, Rozelle S. 2016. Managing Water on China's Farms: Institutions, Policies and the Transformation of Irrigation Under Scarcity. Academic Press.
[04] Hudson NW. 1981. Field Engineering for Agricultural Development Oxford University Press, New York.
[05] Criddle WD, Davis S, Pair CH, Shockley DG. 1956. Methods of evaluating irrigating systems. Soil Conservation Service, Agriculture Handbook No. 82. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D. C.
[06] Bishop AA. 1962. Relation of intake rate to length of run in surface irrigation. Trans. A. S. C. E., 127 (3), 282-293.
[07] James LG. 1988. Principle of Farm Irrigation System Design. John Wiley and sons 4thed. Published by Ernest Benn limited London.
[08] Coolidge P S, Walker WR, Bishop AA. 1982. Advance and runoff-surge flow furrow irrigation. Journal of the irrigation and drainage Division, A. S. C. E., 108, No IRl. Paper 16930, 35-42.
[09] Mostafazadeh B, Mousavi F. 1989. Comparison of information under surge and continuous flow for furrow irrigation. Agricultural Science and Technology. Iran Islamic Republic, 3 (2), 35-43.
[10] McCornick PG, Duke HR, Podmore TH. 1988. Field evaluation procedure for surge irrigation. TraIlS. A. S. A. E., 31 (1), 168-175.
[11] Izadi IB, Heermann DF, Klute A. 1990. The role of redistribution and hysteresis in the surge irrigation phenomena. Trans. A. S. A. E., 33 (3), 799-8806.
[12] Trout TJ. 1990. Furrow Inflow and Infiltration Variability impacts on Irrigation Management. Trans. A. S. A. E., 33 (4), 1171-1172.
[13] Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO. 1977. Crop Water requirement. FAO. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
[14] Michael AM. 1978. Irrigation: Theory and Practice. VlKAS. Publishing House PVT Limited, New Delhi.
[15] Bouyoucus, GJ. 1927. The hydrometer as a new method for the mechanical analysis of soil science 23, 343-353.
[16] Eltom OM. 1989. Field performance of some irrigation scheduling techniques under Shambat conditions. M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agric., Univ. of Khartoum.
[17] Saeed IAM. 1984. Comparative methods of estimation of water requirements of fodder sorghum and lucerne. M. Sc. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Univ. of Khartoum.
[18] Jalali–Farahani, HR, Heermann DF, Duke HR. 1993. Physics of surge irrigation. Trans. A. S. E. E, 36 (1), 45-50.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.