Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal
Articles Information
Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal, Vol.5, No.1, Mar. 2019, Pub. Date: Apr. 26, 2019
Perspectives on the Welfare of Farmed Fur Animals
Pages: 7-12 Views: 202 Downloads: 283
Authors
[01] Hannu Tapio Korhonen, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Teknologiakatu, Kokkola, Finland.
Abstract
Aim was to provide perspectives to question: what should we think about fur animal welfare? Discussion about animal welfare is often based on opinions and beliefs. Scientific facts are forgotten or downplayed. Scientific understanding should be encouraged and emphasized. Caring for animals is associated with an understanding of animal behavior and communication. Caring for animals includes caring for their welfare. Animal welfare legislation can satisfy a basic wellness. When an animal is in balance with itself and its environment, its well-being is good. Well-being is not stable but oscillating: the smaller the oscillation, the better animal welfare can be considered to be. The main parties involved in animal welfare are animal producers, animal activists, the animal itself and legislators. We have three alternatives for the ways in which to keep farmed animals, namely cage, enclosure or nature. Each environment has certain good and bad sides. In the wild, we can find only animals that are alive. Is it right to take only those animals which are alive as a benchmark? Or should we consider also welfare of those who have not coped but died? Discussion on animal welfare is taking place among human beings. Animals cannot speak, so, they can be a party of discussion only indirectly. It is essential that we all let our views be known. We must discuss issues fully, publicly and repeatedly. Finally, we much reach a consensus that will be translated into laws and regulations.
Keywords
Wellbeing, Welfare Models, Moral Understanding, Alternative Environments
References
[01] Appleby, M. C. and Hughes, B. O. (eds). (1997). Animal Welfare. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. 316 p.
[02] Appleby, M. (1999). What should we do about Animal Welfare. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. 192 p.
[03] Carenzi, C. and Verga, M. (2009). Animal welfare: review of the scientific concept and definition. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8: 21-30.
[04] Fraser, D. and MacRae, A. M. (2011). Four types of activities that affect animals: Implications for animal welfare science and animal ethics philosophy. Animal Welfare 20 (4): 581-590.
[05] Kempe, R. (2018). Selection for Welfare and Feed Efficiency in Finnish Blue Fox. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Helsinki, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry. 59 p.
[06] Korhonen, H. (1994). Some considerations, for welfare comparisons, between cages, enclosures and wild conditions in the arctic blue fox. Scientifur 18 (3): 169-171.
[07] Korhonen, H. T., Jauhiainen, L. and Niemelä, P. (2001). Relationships between welfare-related behavioural, physiological and growth variables in juvenile male blue foxes. Annals of Animal Science 18 (2): 151-162.
[08] Korhonen, H. (2002). Välfärd och välfärdforskning bland pälsdjuren. Finsk Pälstidskrift 36 (4): 218-219.
[09] Korhonen, H. T. (2011). Naturenligt välmående – med vem mått mätt? Finsk Pälstidskrift 45 (5): 16-17.
[10] Korhonen, H. T., Koistinen, T. and Mononen, J. (2016). Development of environmental enrichment in blue foxes (Vulpes lagopus): a review. Scientifur 40 (3/4): 305-314.
[11] Koistinen, T., Raatikainen, S., Sepponen, J. and Korhonen, H. T. (2018). Resting preferences and welfare of Finnraccoon (Nyctereutes procyoinoides ussuriensis) females housed in various housing conditions in winter. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 207: 129-137.
[12] Migdley, M. (1986). Letter to the Editors. Between the Species 2: 195-196.
[13] Mononen, J., Möller, S. H., Hansen, S. W., Hovland, A-L., Lidfors, L., Malmkvist, J., Vinke, C. M. and Ahola, L. (2012). The development of on-farm welfare assessment protocols for foxes and mink: the WelFur project. Animal Welfare 21: 363-371.
[14] Mononen, J., Lindeberg, H., Korhonen, H. T. and Kempe, R. (2018). Large size of farmed foxes and its effects on animal welfare. Report for Fur Europe. Natural Resources Institute Finland, Luke. 42 p.
[15] Nimon, A. J. and Broom, D. M. (1999). The welfare of farmed mink (Mustela vison) in relation to housing and management: a review. Animal Welfare 8: 205-228.
[16] Nimon, A. J. and Broom, D. M. (2001). The welfare of farmed foxes Vulpes vulpes andAlopex lagopus in relation to housing and management: a review. Animal Welfare 10: 223-248.
[17] Waiblinger S., Boivin X., Pedersen V., Tosi M-V., Janczak A. M., Visser E. K. and Jones R. B. (2006). Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species. A critical review. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 101: 185-242.
[18] WelFur. (2015a). WelFur Welfare Assessment Protocol for Foxes. WelFur Consortium, Brussels, Belgium. 130 p.
[19] WelFur. (2015b). WelFur Welfare Assessment Protocol for Mink. WelFur Consortium, Brussels, Belgium. 182 p.
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.