American Journal of Business and Society
Articles Information
American Journal of Business and Society, Vol.5, No.2, Jun. 2020, Pub. Date: Mar. 26, 2020
Chinese Studies on PISA Mathematics Test in the Past Two Decades
Pages: 52-56 Views: 74 Downloads: 13
[01] Tianyu Li, The School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.
[02] Zezhong Yang, The School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.
The PISA test focuses on the concept of lifelong learning and pays attention to the problem design of mathematical contextualization. With the increase in participating countries and regions, the PISA test system is also constantly developing and changing. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the PISA test. This article is to review the Chinese studies on the PISA, summarize the specific research aspects and achievements to put forward the prospect of future research. The results show that the domestic research on the PISA test itself is relatively small, but showing an increasing trend. Firstly, research focuses on values and the view of evaluation at the conceptual level, which embodies the characteristics of diversified literacy and instrumental cognition. Secondly, the research focuses on compiling the examination questions and comparative analysis of the PISA test questions with internal test questions and then applying research on two-bit cod. Third, research focuses on the overall development direction, content and contextualization of the PISA. Fourth, the research focuses on the neglect of cultural factors and the evaluation itself in the PISA. Suggestions: enhance the critical understanding of the PISA, we should not only blindly pursue it, but also realize that the PISA itself is not the perfect test. We should combine cultural factors and international perspectives, and we should not neglect its cultural characteristics and educational needs.
PISA, Test Concept, Test Characteristics, Evaluation Framework
[01] Xu, J. Z. (2012). "Literacy": The Pedagogical Position Behind the View of PISA Literacy. Foreign Primary and Secondary Education, (1): 17-23.
[02] Pan, Y. (2011). Enlightenment of PISA Values and Evaluation of Chinese Education Innovation. Zhejiang Education Science, (5): 3-7.
[03] Wang, D., & Li, B. M. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Times and PISA Mathematical Evaluation Analysis Framework. Global Education Outlook, (6): 20-34.
[04] Tong, Y. J. (2014). Enlightenment of PISA 2012 Mathematics Test on Cultivating Students' Mathematical Literacy. Middle School Mathematics Monthly, (5): 8-10, 17.
[05] Li, Y. J., Tang, H. F., & Meng, L. Q. (2019). Analysis of Effective Teaching Evaluation Thoughts in PISA2015 International Evaluation. Contemporary Educational Science, (9): 29-33.
[06] Wang, L., & Jing, A. L. (2013). What Have We Learned from PISA——A Study Based on the PISA China Test. Peking University Education Review, (1): 172-180.
[07] Su, H. Yu. (2008). PISA: The Design and Development Process of Mathematical Literacy Test Questions. Teaching and Management, (13): 49-51.
[08] Shen, Y. & Yu, P. (2017). Comparison and Thinking of PISA2012 and Chinese Mathematics Exams——Taking Nanjing Exam as an Example. Bulletin of Mathematics, (1): 6-8, 37.
[09] Lei, W., &Wei, W. (2016). Viewing the Online Scoring of College Entrance Examinations from the PISA Code. Educational Science Research, (4): 33-38, 45.
[10] Chen, J., Zhang, X., & Chen, S. R. (2017). Multi-perspective Classification Analysis and Inspiration Based on 50 PISA Mathematical Sample Questions. Junior High School Mathematics Teaching and Learning, (8): 39-41.
[11] Wu, C. X. (2009). Evaluation of PISA Mathematical Literacy and its Characteristics. Bulletin of Mathematics, (6): 40-44, 48.
[12] Ma, J. S., & Cai, J. (2019). Global Education Governance Penetration: The Purpose of OCED Education Policy: A Critical Analysis Based on the PISA Test Literature. Comparative Education Research, (2): 3-11.
[13] Yuan, J. L., & Liu, H. Y. (2016). The Experience and Trend of International Large-scale Education Evaluation——Taking PISA as an Example. Information Technology Education in Primary and Middle Schools, 20-23.
[14] Dong, L. C., Wu, L. B., & Wang, L. D. (2019). Review of PISA2021 Mathematical Literacy Evaluation Framework. Journal of Mathematical Education, (4): 6-11, 60.
[15] Yu, G. W., Chen, P. J., Feng, Q. L., Cao, Y. M. (2019). Evolution and Enlightenment of the Content and Context of PISA Mathematical Evaluation. Journal of Mathematics Education, (4): 17-23.
[16] Cao, Y. M., & Zhu, Z. M. (2019). Change and Invariance: Evolution of the Mathematical Evaluation Framework of PISA2000-2021. Journal of Mathematical Education, (4): 1-5.
[17] Lv, Y. Z. (2019). On the Misunderstanding of the Use of PISA Results at the Methodology Level. World Education Information, (4): 69-72.
[18] Yu, G. W., & Cao, Y. M. (2019). Finland: Insider Reflection on PISA Fever——Dialogue with Evaluation Team of Finnish Institute of Education. Foreign Primary and Secondary Education, (6): 1-9.
[19] Tan, J. C. (2014). What has PISA Changed? Japan's Education Reform from the Perspective of Academic Performance Evaluation. Journal of Teacher Education, 1 (5): 45-51.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.