[01] Perez Oyugi, Department of Education, Great Lakes University of Kisumu, Kisumu, Kenya.

This paper is a part of a larger international comparative study entitled "Institutional Dimensions of Professional Knowledge: Processes and Implication for School Leaders across Educational Contexts”. This study explored the influence of institutional factors on Kenyan and Canadian school principals’ constructions of knowledge and practice related to the principalship. A secondary purpose of the study was to develop a theory on the processes that school principals use to link institutional imperatives to their constructions of knowledge and practice. The study uses a constructivist grounded theory approach within a qualitative design. 7 principals from Kisumu County, Kenya and 5 principals from Ontario, Canada participated in the study. This paper outlines constructions of knowledge, skills, and dispositions related to school principalship by participants from Kenya. Results show that in the process of constructing knowledge for the principalship, individuals drew upon their experiences and formal knowledge gained during teacher training programs. Results also show that individuals in positions of school leadership/principalship were expected to be knowledgeable in teaching, curriculum, financial management, psychology, management, laws and regulations. Further, these knowledge ideas were based on constitutive and regulative rules, on assumptions that they are widely shared, and on individual constructions of contextual educational imperatives.

Principalship, School Leadership, Principal Knowledge, Principal Dispositions

[01] Astley, W. G. (1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 497-513. Astor, R. A., Guerra, N., and Acker, R. V. (2010). How can we improve school safety research? Educational Researcher. 39(1), 69-78. [02] Athanasoula-Reppa, A., & Lazaridou, A. (2008). Requirements, roles, and challenges of the principalship in Greece and Cyprus: newly appointed principals views. European Education 40(3), 65-88. [03] Bengtson, E., Zepeda, S. J., & Parylo, O. (2013). School systems’ practices of controlling socialization during principal succession: Looking through the lens of an organizational socialization theory. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 41(2), 143-164. [04] Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. [05] Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1993). Everyday epistemology in school leadership: Patterns and prospects. In P. Hallinger, K. Leithwood, and J. Murphey (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Educational Leadership, (pp. 21 - 33). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. [06] Bryk, A., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [07] Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London, UK: Heinemann. [08] Bush, T., Kiggundu, E., & Moorosi, P. (2011). Preparing new principals in South Africa: The ACE school leadership programme. South African Journal of Education, 31(1), 31-43. [09] Bush, T., & Oduro, G. (2006). New principals in Africa: Preparation, induction and practice. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(2), 359-375. [10] Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, (4th ed., pp. 359-380). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [11] Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [12] Cohen, B. J. & Orbech, T. L. (1990). Social Institutions and Formal Organizations. Introduction to Sociology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. [13] Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. [14] Dougherty, D. (2004). Organizing practices in services: Capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation. Strategic Organization, 2(1), 35-64. [15] Elmore, R. (2006). Leadership as the practice of improvement. (Paper prepared for the International Conference on Perspectives on Leadership for Systemic Improvement). OECD, London, UK. [16] Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordin, Ed.). New York: Pantheon. [17] Glaser, B., & Straus, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine. [18] Goldwyn, S. (2008). Examining educational leaders' knowledge base: Investigating educational leaders' domain knowledge of reading. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Paper 4167. [19] Goldring, E., Huff, J., Spillane, J., & Barnes, C. (2009). Measuring the instructional leadership expertise of school principals. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(2), 197-228. [20] Greenfield, W. D. (2009). Forward. Administrative passages: Navigating the transition from teacher to assistant principal. New York, NY: Springer. [21] Hafner, M. M. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing leaders for social justice. In C. Marshall & M. Oliver (Eds.). Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education (2nd ed., pp. 194-218). New York, NY: Pearson. [22] Hess, F., & Kelly, A. (2007). What gets taught in principal preparation programs. The Teachers College Record, 109(1), 244-274. [23] Howells, S. (2006). Bullying, institutions and the therapeutic culture: How schools respond to social problems. OpenAccess Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved August 20, 2012 from http://digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/opendissertations/5547. [24] Ibrahim, N. (2011). Preparation and development of public secondary schools principals in Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), 291-301. [25] Jwan, J.O. & Ongodo, C.O. (2011). Educating leaders for learning in schools in Kenya: The need for a re-conceptualization. In T. Townsend and J. MacBeth (Eds.). International Handbook for Leadership for Learning, Vol 25, 397-418. New York, NY: Springer. [26] Lazaridou, A. (2009). The kinds of knowledge principals’ use: Implications for training. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 4(10), 1-15. [27] Leo, U., & Wickenberg, P. (2013). Professional norms in school leadership: Change efforts in implementation of education for sustainable development. Journal of Education Change, 2013(14), 403-422. [28] Lin, M. D., & Cheng, S. Y. (2010). Principals’ cognitive frameworks in Taiwan. International Studies in Education 11(2010), 1-9. [29] McGlynn, C. (2008) Leading integrated schools: A study of multicultural perspectives of Northern Irish principals. Journal of Peace Education, 5(1), 3-16. [30] Miller, S. (2012). Social institutions. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), E. N. Zalta (Ed.), retrieved August 28, 2012 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/social-institutions [31] Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision (pp. 211-77). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. [32] Moloi, K. (2007). An overview of educational management in South Africa. South Africa Journal of Education, 27(3). [33] Morford, L. M. (2002). Learning the ropes or being hung: Organizational socialization influences on new rural high school principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, (New Orleans, April1-5, 2002). [34] Mullen, C. A. (2008). Theories and applications of social justice leadership. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers' Professional Development, 12(4), 275-278. [35] Nestor-Baker, N. S., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). Tacit knowledge of school superintendents: Its nature, meaning and content. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 86-129. [36] Oliva, M., Anderson, G. L. & Byng, J. (2010). Dilemmas and lessons: The continuing leadership challenge for social justice. In C. Marshall & M. Oliver (Eds.), Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education (2nd ed., pp. 284-327). New York: Pearson. [37] Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635 - 652. [38] Sang, J. (2010). The preparedness of Kenyan secondary school head teachers as leaders and managers of schools in Kenya. Journal of African Studies on Educational Management and Leadership, 1(1). [39] Scheurich, J. J. (1995). The knowledge base in educational administration: Postpositivist reflections. In R. Donmoyer, M. Imber, & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.). Knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives (pp 17-31). Albany, NY: Sunny Press. [40] Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [41] Scott, W. R. (2008a). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29(2), 219-238. [42] Scott, W. R. (2008b). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [43] Scott, W. R. (2008c). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427-442. [44] Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In Ken G. Smith and Michael A. Hitt (Eds.). Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [45] Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield. [46] Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London, UK: Routledge. [47] Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. [48] St. Germaine, L., & Quinn, D. (2005). Invention of tacit knowledge in principal leadership. Education Forum, 70(1), 65-90. [49] State University of New York (1995). Introduction: Knowledge base problems in educational administration. New York, NY: State University of New York Press. [50] Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Enquiry, 19(1), 14-20. [51] Thomson, P., Gunter, H. M., & Blackmore, J. (2013). Series forward. In Educational Leadership and Michel Foucault. New York, NY: Routledge. [52] Tomic, W., & Kingma, J. (1996). Three theories of cognitive representation and criteria for evaluating training effects. Educational Practice and Theory, 18(1), 15-35. [53] Turner, J. (1997). The Institutional Order. New York, NY: Longman. [54] Udo-Akang, D. (2012). Theoretical constructs, concepts, and applications. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(9), 89-97. [55] Wagenaar, H. (2004). Knowing the rules: Administrative work as practice. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 643-656. [56] Wassink, H., Sleegers, P., & Imants, J. (2003). Cause maps and school leaders’ tacit knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(5), 524-546. [57] Zembylas, M. & Iasonos, S. (2010). Leadership styles and multicultural education approaches: An exploration of their relationship. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 163-183.