Clinical Medicine Journal
Articles Information
Clinical Medicine Journal, Vol.4, No.4, Dec. 2018, Pub. Date: 16, 2019
Comparison of Basic and Advanced Level Ecg Between Clinics
Pages: 67-71 Views: 1311 Downloads: 451
Authors
[01] Mehmet Serdar Cengizhan, Deparment of Internal Medicine, Bilecik State Institute, Bilecik, Turkey.
[02] Isa Ardahanlı, Deparment of Cardiology, Bilecik State Institute, Bilecik, Turkey.
[03] Saadet Celik, Deparment of Medical Biochemistry, Division of Public Health Laboratory, Bilecik, Turkey.
Abstract
Electrocardiography [ECG] comes at the forefront of laboratory methods used to diagnose cardiovascular diseases Non-invasive, short duration, easy to implement and cheap are the most important advantages. ECG is a valuable method for diagnosing rhythm disorders and acute coronary events. ECG evaluations should be done together with medical history and physical examination findings. Due to the increase in elderly population, patients with heart disease have significantly increased the number of applications for emergency services. The physicians who first examine these diseases are internal medicine specialists, emergency specialists, cardiologists or practitioners in charge of emergency services. Sometimes, making mistakes in vital situations that need to be assessed in a short time can cause undesirable results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the interclinical ECG approach.
Keywords
Electrocardiography, General Approach, Patient Management
References
[01] Correction to: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018 Mar 20; 137 (12): e493.
[02] Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018 Mar 20; 137 (12): e67-e492.
[03] American Heart Association. My Life Check - Life’s Simple 7. http:// www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/My-Life-Check—Lifes-Simple 7_UCM_471453_Article.jsp#.WBwQnvKQzio. Accessed June 30, 2016.
[04] Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Strategic Planning Task Force and Statistics Committee. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010; 121: 586–613
[05] Younus A, Aneni EC, Spatz ES, Osondu CU, Roberson L, Ogunmoroti O, Malik R, Ali SS, Aziz M, Feldman T, Virani SS, Maziak W, Agatston AS, Veledar E, Nasir K. A systematic review of the prevalence and outcomes of ideal cardiovascular health in US and non-US populations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016; 91: 649–670.
[06] European cardiovascular disease statistics 2017 European Heart Network.
[07] Hoyert DL, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kung HC. Deaths: final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006 Apr 19; 54 (13): 1-120.
[08] Hendel RC, Budoff MJ, Cardella JF et al; American College of Cardiology (ACC); American Heart Association (AHA). ACC/AHA/ACR/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SIRm 2008 Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiac Imaging A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Data Standards for Cardiac Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 Jan 6; 53 (1): 91-124.
[09] Rutten FH, Kessels AG, Willems FF, Hoes AW. Electrocardiography in primary care; is it useful? Int J Cardiol. 2000 Jul 31; 74 (2-3): 199-205.
[10] Douglas PS, Chen J, Gillam L, Hendel R, Hundley WG, Masoudi F, Patel MR, Peterson E. Achieving Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging II: proceedings from the Second American College of Cardiology -- Duke University Medical Center Think Tank on Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Feb; 2 (2): 231-40.
[11] Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al: 2010 ACCF/AHA guidelines for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: pp. e50
[12] Schlant RC, Adolph RJ, DiMarco JP, et al: Guidelines for electrocardiography. A report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Electrocardiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: pp. 473
[13] Goldberger JJ, Cain ME, Hohnloser SH, et al: American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society scientific statement on noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. Circulation 2008; 118: pp. 1497
[14] Fleisher LA, Fleischman KE, Auerbach AD, et al: 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: pp. e77
[15] Moyer VA: Screening for coronary heart disease with electrocardiography: USPSTF recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157: pp. 512
[16] Joint Task Force on Non-Cardiac Surgery: 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: pp. 2381
[17] Kligfield P, Gettes L, Bailey JJ, et al: Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I. The electrocardiogram and its standardization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: pp. 1109
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.