International Journal of Economics and Business Administration
Articles Information
International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Vol.1, No.2, Sep. 2015, Pub. Date: Aug. 10, 2015
Does Trade Openness Influence Economic Growth?
Pages: 120-127 Views: 1438 Downloads: 1065
Authors
[01] Fateh Habibi, Department Economics, Faulty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the effects of trade openness on economic growth. We use panel cointegration tests and panel error-correction models (ECM) to explore the causal relationship between trade openness and economic growth for 120 countries over the period 2000-2013. The results of pedroni cointegration test demonstrate that trade openness and economic growth is cointegrated; on the other hand, a long run relationship can be fine among these two variables. We segment the data set into four subpanels according to per capita income classification that distinguishes between low-income, lower-middle-income, upper-middle income and high-income economies. The results suggest that the long-run causality between trade openness and growth runs in four panel groups. The result indicates that bidirectional causalities in the study were observed from real GDP growth to trade openness in all panels except low income groups. Second, unidirectional causation from trade openness to economic growth was obtained in the study for low income economies. The desired growth-led openness and openness-led growth hypothesis can only be supported for Upper middle and high income countries.
Keywords
Trade Openness, Economic Growth, Classification Countries, Panel Data
References
[01] A. Lewis. 1980. The slowing down of engine of growth. American Economic review, 70: 555-564.
[02] Ahmed J, Kwan, AC. 1991. Causality between exports and economic growth. Economics Letters, 37: 246–48.
[03] Arif, A and Agmad, H. 2012. Impact of Trade openness on output growth: Cointegration and error correction Model approach, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(4):479-385.
[04] Bahmani-Oskooee M, Alse J. 1993. Export growth and economic growth: an application of co-integration and error correction modeling. The Journal of eveloping Areas, 27: 535–42.
[05] Barro, R.J.; Sala-i-Martin, X. 1995. Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, Cambridge, MA.
[06] Bouoiyour, J. 2003. Trade and GDP Growth in Morocco: Short-run or Long-run Causality?, Brazilian Journal of Business and Economics , Vol 3. No. 2, pp. 14-21.
[07] Chang, R.; Kaltani, L.; Loayza, N. (2009), Openness is Good for Growth: The Role of Policy Complementarities, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 90, pp. 33-49.
[08] Chow P C. 1987. Causality between export growth and industrial development: Empirical evidence from the NICs. Journal of Development Economics, 36: 55–63.
[09] Darrat AF. 1986. Trade and development: the Asian experience. Cato Journal 6: 695–99.
[10] Deme M. 2002. An examination of the trade-led growth hypothesis in Nigeria: a Co-integration, causality, and impulse response analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas, 36: 1–15.
[11] Dowrick, S. and Golley, J. 2004. Trade openness and growth: Who benefits? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1): 38-56.
[12] Dodaro S. 1993. Exports and growth: a reconsidera-tion of causality. The Journal of Developing Areas, 27: 227–44.
[13] Dollar, D.; Kraay, A. 2002. Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3): 195-- 225.
[14] Ekanayake, Vogal and Veeramacheneni. 2003. Openness and economic growth: empirical evidence on the relationship between output, inward FDI, and trade. Journal of Business Strategies, 20.
[15] Jin CJ. 1995. Export-led growth and the four little dragons. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 4: 203–15.
[16] Jung WS, Marshall PJ. 1985. Exports, growth and causality in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 18: 1–12.
[17] Harrison. 1996. Openness and growth: A time series cross country analysis for developing countries. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper no.5221.
[18] Hassan and Kamrul, A F. 2005. Trade openness and economic growth: Search for a Causal Relationship. South Asian Journal of Management. Retrieved on 25th December,2010 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5483/is_200510/ai_n21363857/?tag=content;col1.
[19] Hsiao, M.W. 1987. Tests of causality and exogeneity between export growth and economic growth, Journal of Economic Development, 12: 143--159.
[20] Im, K.S.; Pesaran, M.H.; Shin, Y. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115(1): 53-74.
[21] Grossman, G.M.; Helpman, E. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[22] Krueger AO. 1980. Trade policy as an input to development. American Economic Review, 70: 288–292.
[23] Levin, A.; Lin, C.F.; Chu, C.S.J. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finitesample properties, Journal of Econometrics, 108(1): 1-24.
[24] Marin D. 1992. Is the export-led hypothesis valid for industrialized countries? Review of Economics and Statistics, 74: 678–688.
[25] Narayan PK, Narayan S. 2005. Are exports and imports co-integrated? Evidence from 22 least developed countries. Applied Economics Letters, 12: 375–78.
[26] Narayan PK, Smyth R. 2004. The relationship between the real exchange rate and balance of payments: empirical evidence for China from co-integration and causality testing. Applied Economic Letters, 11: 287–91.
[27] Pedroni, P. 1999. Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 653-70.
[28] Pedroni, P. 2004. Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic And Finite Sample Properties Of Pooled Time Series Tests With An Application To The PPP Hypothesis, Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, 20(3): 97-625.
[29] Romer. 1993. Two strategies for economic development: Using ideas and producing ideas, proceedings of the World Bank annual conference on development economics, 1992, ed.Summers, L.H; Shah, S., pp. 63--91. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
[30] Sala-i-Martin, X. 1997. I Just Ran Two Million Regressions, The American Economic Review, 87(2): 178-183.
[31] Shan JZ, Sun F. 1998. Export-led growth hypothesis for Australia: an empirical re-investigation. Applied Economics Letters, 5: 423–8.
[32] World Bank. 2015. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups%23Low_income.
[33] Xu X. 1996. On the causality between export growth and GDP growth: an empirical re-investigation. Review of International Economics, 4: 172-184.
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2017 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.