International Journal of Energy Science and Engineering
Articles Information
International Journal of Energy Science and Engineering, Vol.2, No.4, Jul. 2016, Pub. Date: Sep. 3, 2016
The Effect of Packed Column Addition to the Performance of Biogas Stove
Pages: 23-27 Views: 3597 Downloads: 790
Authors
[01] Syamsuri , Mechanical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
[02] Nyoman Puspa Asri, Chemical Engineering Department, Universitas WR Supratman Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
[03] Yustia Wulandari, Chemical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
[04] Suheni , Mechanical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
[05] Muhammad Ali, Mechanical Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Abstract
Concomitant depletion of energy sources and fuel shortages that occurred in Indonesia today, it takes a cheap alternative energy sources and environmentally friendly, one of which is biogas. Biogas can be produced from organic wastes such as garbage, food scraps, manure and food-industry wastes. The fermentations of the above materials to produce biogas largest component levels are CH4 (55% - 75%) and CO2 (25%-45%). Utilization of biogas as a fuel is still in the household and unused optimally. This is due to biogas CO2 still contains high levels of heat generated so that efficiency is still low. To reduce the amount of CO2 contained in the biogas is to absorb CO2 using K2CO3 solution continuously in a reactor (absorber). Through this research, we can know the difference between the performance of biogas stoves are using absorption and without absorption using a burner that has a fire pit which varies the burner flame holes with a diameter of 2 mm to produce power of 0.47 kW and an efficiency of 61.64% without absorption and0.65 kW and efficient by 71.74% with absorption. The burner with 3 mm diameter of fire pits produce power of 0.50 kW and an efficiency of 59.44% without absorption. However, 0.56 kW power and 82.09% of efficiency with absorption. Next, a fire pit burner with a diameter of 4 mm produce power of 0, 55 kW and an efficiency of 54.81% without absorption. Whereas 0.65 kW power and 73.99% efficiency with absorption.
Keywords
Absorption, Biogas, CH4, Packed Column, K2CO3
References
[01] Meynell D. S. 1976. Methane: Planning a digester. Great Britain: Prism Press.
[02] Sihombing D. T. H. 1980. Prospects use of biogas for rural energy in Indonesia, LPL, No. 11 Tahun XIV, LEMIGAS, Jakarta, Indonesia.
[03] Indartono Y. S. 2005. Biogas reactor for small and medium scale (part-one). http://www.beritaiptek.com/statik.php [11 January, 2007].
[04] Widodo T. W., Asari Ahmad., Nurhasanah A. and Rahmarestia E. 2006. Engineering and testing biogas reactor for farmer group scale, Balai Besar Pengembangan Mekanisasi Pertanian, Jurnal Enjinering Pertanian. pp. 41-52.
[05] Sofian A. 2008. Improving the quality of biogas as a fuel combustion engine by way of a reduction in the levels of CO2 in the biogas using slurry of Ca (OH) 2, Jurusan Teknik Mesin-Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta.
[06] Jianbin Guo, Joachim Clemens, Xiaoping Li, Pan Xu and Renjie Dong. 2012. Performance evaluation of a Chinese medium-sized agricultural biogas plant at ambient temperature, Engineering in Life Sciences, Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 336–342.
[07] Cassiano Rossetto, Samuel Nelson Melegari de Souza, Reginaldo Ferreira Santo, Juliano de Souza and Otávia Lidia Klaus.2013. Performance of an otto cycle engine using biogas as fuel, African Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 8(45), pp. 5607-5610.
[08] Chamarthi S., N. Srinivasa Reddy, and G Ravi Chandra.2013. Experimental investigation on performance improvement of biogas plant, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 3, Issue 3, pp. 1218-1223.
[09] Rabiu, A., Yaakub, H., Liang, J. B., and Samsudin, A. A. 2014. Enhancing biogas production rate ofcattle manure using rumen fluid of ruminants, IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, Vol.7, Issue 3, pp. 25-28.
[10] Patrick Mukumba, Golden Makaka, and Chipo Shonhiwa. 2015. An assessment of the performance of a biogas digester when insulated with sawdust, International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 24-31.
[11] Satoni, G, dan Savage, D. W. 1983. Sterically hindered amines for CO2 removal from gases. Ind.Eng.Chem.Fundam, 22, 239.
[12] Alatiqi, I. M., Dadkhah, A. A., Akbar, A. M., dan Hamouda, H. F. 1994. Comparison between dynamics and control performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic sludge digesters. Chem. Eng. J., 55, B55-B66 (1994).
[13] Oyenekan, Rochelle, dan Abo. 2007. Alternative Stripper Configurations for CO2 Capture by Aqueous Amines. AIChE Journal, vol. 53, No. 12, pp. 3144-3154.
[14] Mofarahi M., Khojasteh Y., Khaledi H., dan Farahnak A. 2008. Design of CO2 absorption plant for recovery of CO2 from flue gases of gas turbine. Energy 33, 1311-1319.
[15] Tippayawong, N., Thanompongchart, P. 2010. Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor. Energy, 35, 4531-4535.
[16] Bhattacharya S. C., Kumar S., Leon M. A. and Khang A. M. (2003). Design and performance of natural draft gasifier stove for use in institutional and industrial. International Conference. Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
[17] Incropera & David. 2011. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 7th Ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York, USA.
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.