International Journal of Materials Chemistry and Physics
Articles Information
International Journal of Materials Chemistry and Physics, Vol.1, No.2, Oct. 2015, Pub. Date: Aug. 10, 2015
Commonly Available Commercial Insecticide Formulations and Their Applications in the Field
Pages: 116-123 Views: 3213 Downloads: 11995
[01] Muhammad Sarwar, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
The objective of this article is to know the types of formulations, familiar with the major families of pesticides side by side their modes of action, what to consider in choosing the best formulation along with when to use various formulations and compatibility. Generally, the formulations are commercially produced for drugs, cosmetics, coatings, dyes, alloys, cleaning agents, foods, lubricants, fuels, fertilizers, pesticides and many others. Nevertheless, pesticides also come in various formulations and formulations enable the pesticide to be applied, but, insecticides specifically kill insects and are just one of many types of pesticides. An insecticide formulation can be principally a wettable powder (WP), soluble powder (SP), or emulsifiable concentrate (EC). These formulations are relatively easy to handle, transport, store, little agitation is required, do not settle out or separate when equipment is running, non-abrasive, cannot plug screens or nozzles, and leaves little visible residue on treated surfaces. Insecticide formulations are broken-down into active ingredients and inert ingredients. The active ingredients in insecticide are the chemicals that control the target pest upon application. Most insecticide products have inert (inactive) ingredients, which are used to dilute the pesticide or to make it safer, more effective, easier to measure, mix, or apply, and more convenient to handle. In that sense a formulation may be created according to the standard of the product for any of the purposes such as to achieve effects that cannot be obtained from its components when these are used singly, achieve a higher degree of effectiveness, facilitate any potential synergistic action of their components, and improve handling properties and often safety for the user. Some insecticides can be mixed together (i.e., these are compatible with each other); not all insecticides can be mixed together (incompatible) because these separate out of the solution, gel, curdle, or clog the equipment during application; and insecticides that are physically different (i.e., dust versus liquid) are typically incompatible. Consequently, the competently designed formulations for particular applications are safer, more effective and more economical than any of their components used singly.
Formulation, Insecticide, Pesticide, Compatibility, Concentration
[01] Ahmad, N., Sarwar, M., Khan, G.Z., Tofique, M. and Salam, A. 2011. Efficacy of Some Plant Products and Synthetic Chemicals to Manage the Outbreak of Mealy Bug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus) in Cotton. Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 3 (1): 16-21.
[02] Akbar, A., Sarwar, M., Ahmad, N. and Tofique, M. 2005. Evaluation of Different Granular Insecticides for the Suppression of Rice Stem Borers. Proce. 25th Pakistan Conger. of Zoology, March 1-3, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam. 25: 49-55.
[03] Bohmont, B.L. 1990. The standard pesticide user's guide (revised). Prentice Hall: Princeton, NJ.
[04] Burges, H.D. 1998. Formulation of mycoinsecticides. In: Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides, Beneficial Microorganisms, Nematodes and Seed Treatments (H.D. Burges, Ed.), pp. 131-185. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
[05] Chloe, D.P., Karl, W.J.W., Jon, E.S., Bryan, G., Tracye, M.M. and Michael, J.L. 2015. Assessing the fate and effects of an insecticidal formulation. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 34 (1): 197-207.
[06] Farm Chemicals Handbook. 1997. Meister Publishing Company, Willoughby, OH.
[07] Hina, H.K., Sarwar, M. and Lohar, M.K. 2015. Repellence Activity of Plant Oils against Red Flour Beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in Wheat. International Journal of Animal Biology, 1 (3): 86-92.
[08] Khan, M.H., Sarwar, M., Farid, A. and Syed, F. 2010. Compatibility of pyrethroid and different concentrations of neem seed extract on parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) under laboratory conditions. The Nucleus, 47 (4): 327-331.
[09] Knowles, D.A. 1998. Chemistry and technology of agricultural formulations. Kluwer Academic, London. 412 p.
[10] Label Review Manual. 1998. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC,. Miller, T.L, Ed. Oregon State University Extension Service: Corvallis.
[11] Oregon Pesticide Applicator's Manual. 1993. A guide to the safe use and handling of pesticides.
[12] Pimentel, D. 2005. Environmental and Economic Costs of the Application of Pesticides Primarily in the United State. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7: 229-252.
[13] Rajput, A.A., Sarwar, M., Bux, M. and Tofique, M. 2003. Evaluation of synthetic and some plant origin insecticides against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 6 (5): 496-499.
[14] Rathburn, C.B.J. 1985. Insecticide formulations- types and uses: A review. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc., 1 (1): 80-84.
[15] Sarwar, M. 2012. Competency of Natural and Synthetic Chemicals in Controlling Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea Crop. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2 (4):132-135.
[16] Sarwar, M. 2013. Comparative Suitability of Soil and Foliar Applied Insecticides against the Aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Aphididae: Hemiptera) In Canola Brassica napus L. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences, 1 (7): 138-143.
[17] Sarwar, M. 2014. Understanding the Importance and Scope of Agricultural Education to the Society. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 1 (2): 145-148.
[18] Sarwar, M., Ahmad, N., Bux, M., Nasrullah and Tofique, M. 2011. Comparative field evaluation of some newer versus conventional insecticides for the control of aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). The Nucleus, 48 (2): 163-167.
[19] Sarwar, M., Ahmad, N., Siddiqui, Q.H., Rajput, A.A. and Tofique, M. 2003. Efficiency of different chemicals on Canola strain Rainbow (Brassica napus L.) for aphids control. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2 (11): 831-833.
[20] Sarwar, M., Akbar, A., Ahmad, N., Khan, G.Z., Bux, M. and Tofique, M. 2007. Field Performance of Systemic Foliar and Granular Insecticides against Rice Stem Borers (Scirpophaga spp.) in Rice Crop. Proce. 26th Pakistan Conger. of Zoology, Multan, March 1-3. 27: 89-94.
[21] Terms of the Environment. 1997. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.
[22] The University of Arizona. 2000. Pesticide Types & Formulations. Chapter 3: Arizona Agricultural Pesticide Applicator Training Manual, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721. p. III.1-III.21.
[23] University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service. 1992. A guide for private and commercial applicators: Applying pesticides correctly. National pesticide applicator training core manual, University of Nebraska: Lincoln.
[24] Ware, G.W. 1994. The Pesticide Book. 4th ed; W.H. Freeman: Fresno, CA.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.