International Journal of Preventive Medicine Research
Articles Information
International Journal of Preventive Medicine Research, Vol.4, No.4, Dec. 2018, Pub. Date: Oct. 9, 2018
Attitude Towards Euthanasia Among Undergraduate Medical Students a Cross-Sectional Study
Pages: 89-97 Views: 2728 Downloads: 1106
[01] Vishalini a/p Ravichandran, Faculty of Medicine, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE)), Melaka, Malaysia.
[02] Han Min Siew, Faculty of Medicine, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE)), Melaka, Malaysia.
[03] Lau Chun Teck, Faculty of Medicine, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE)), Melaka, Malaysia.
[04] Darshan a/l Sathish, Faculty of Medicine, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE)), Melaka, Malaysia.
[05] Shavenea Ravisha, Faculty of Medicine, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE)), Melaka, Malaysia.
Introduction; Euthanasia, i.e. mercy killing, is a highly controversial topic and has grown remarkably over the past decade particularly with rapid medical advancement and the growing population of aging society. Objective; to study the factors affecting attitudes of medical students on euthanasia in Melaka Manipal Medical College. Methods; A pre-validated questionnaire based analytical cross-sectional design was used to conduct this research. The questionnaires were distributed to medical students in Semester 6, 7 and 8. 211 participants have answered the questionnaire. Attitude towards euthanasia were assessed in 5-point Likert Scale namely: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree with case scenarios. Results; The mean score for attitude towards Euthanasia is 26.8 ± 6.4 (range from 10 to 43). There is significant positive correlation between empathy and attitude towards euthanasia (r=0.25 p=0.002.). As for religiosity, Non-Organizational Religious Activity there is significant positive correlation with attitude towards euthanasia (r=0.14, p=0.024). The next subscale under religiosity is Intrinsic Religiosity which has positive significant relation to attitude towards euthanasia (r=0.14, p=0.028). Conclusion; This study shows that empathy and religiosity play significant roles in attitude towards euthanasia.
Attitude, Euthanasia, Medical Students, Survey
[01] See H Biggs, Euthanasia, Death with Dignity and the Law, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), 12.
[02] (2018). [online] Available at: [Accessed 27 Jun. 2018].
[03] DVK Chao, NY Chan, WY Chan; Euthanasia revisited, Family Practice, Volume 19, Issue 2, 1 April 2002, Pages 128–134, ttps://
[04] van der Maas PJ, Pijnenborg L, van Delden JJ. Changes in Dutch opinions on active euthanasia, 1966 through 1991. JAMA 1995; 273: 1411–4.
[05] Roy Morgan Research Centre. Morgan Polls on Medically Assisted Death. Finding No. 2933. Melbourne: Roy Morgan Research Centre. [online]
[06] Benson JM. The polls-trends—End-of-life issues. Public Opinion Quarterly 1999; 63: 263–77.
[07] Blendon RJ, Szalay US, Knox RA. Should physicians aid their patients in dying? The public perspective. JAMA 1992; 267: 2658–62.
[08] Gallup Canada (1968–2002). The Gallup report. Toronto, Canadian Institute of Public Opinion
[09] Samia A Hurst A. Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non-physicians [Internet]. PubMed Central (PMC). 2018 [cited 28 June 2018]. Available from:
[10] Bosshard G, Broeckaert B, Clark D, Materstvedt LJ, Gordijn B, Müller-Busch HC. A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries. J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan; 34 (1): 28-32.
[11] Caddell DP, Newton RR. Euthanasia: American attitudes toward the physician’s role. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 1671–1681.
[12] Bachman JG, Alcser KH, Doukas DJ, Lichtenstein RL, Corning AD, Brody H. Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 303–309.
[13] Stevens CA, Hassan R. Management of death, dying and euthanasia: attitudes and practices of medical practitioners in South Australia. J Med Ethics 1994; 20: 41–46.
[14] Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Daniels ER, Clarridge BR. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: attitudes of oncology patients, oncologists, and the public. Lancet 1996; 347: 1805–1810.
[15] Meier DE, Emmons CA, Wallenstein S, Quill T, Morrisin RS, Cassel CK. A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1993–2001.
[16] Shuman CR, Fournet GP, Zelhart PF, Roland BC, Estes R. Attitudes of registered nurses toward euthanasia. Death Studies 1992; 16: 1–15.
[17] Asch DA. The role of critical care nurses in euthanasia and assisted suicide. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1374–1379.
[18] Graber MA, Levy BI, Weir RF, Oppliger RA. Patients’ view about physicians’ participation in assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 71–76.
[19] Groenewoud JH, van der Mas PJ, van der Wal G, Hengeweld M, Tholen AJ, Schudel WJ, van der Heide A: Physician-assisted death in psychiatric practice in the Netherlands. N Engl J Med, 1997; 336: 1795–1801
[20] Suarez-Almazor ME, Belzile M, Bruera E. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a comparative survey of physicians, terminally ill cancer patients, and the general population.
[21] J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 418 –27.13 Holloway HD, Hayslip B, Murdock ME, et al. Measuring attitudes toward euthanasia. Omega (Westport.) 1994; 30: 53–65.14
[22] Nilstun T, Melltorp G, Hermeren G. Surveys on attitudes to active euthanasia and the difficulty of drawing normative conclusions. Scand J Public Health 2000; 28: 111-16.
[23] Adchalingam K e. Attitudes of medical students towards euthanasia in a multicultural setting. - PubMed - NCBI [Internet]. 2018 [cited 28 June 2018]. Available from:
[24] Euthanasia and living wills in Malaysia - two sides of the coin - Nation | The Star Online [Internet]. 2018 [cited 28 June 2018]. Available from:
[25] Chan L, Arif A, Jeyasingam V. Euthanasia in Malaysia: Opinions and controversies. Journal of Health and Translational Medicine. 2002; 7 (2): 92-99.
[26] Koenig, H. and Büssing, A. (2018). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A Five-Item Measure for Use in Epidemological Studies.
[27] Lipps T. Einfühlung, innere Nachahmung und Organempfindung. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie. 1903; 1: 465–519.
[28] Eisenberg N, Miller PA. Empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 1987; 101: 91–119.
[29] Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2000; 4: 223–233
[30] Rice GE. Aiding behavior vs. fear in the albino rat. Psychological Record. 1964; 14: 165–170.
[31] Levenson RW, Ruef AM. Empathy: a physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992; 63: 234–246.
[32] Carolyn Winget, Frederic T Kapp and Rosalee C Yeaworth. Attitudes towards euthanasia. Journal of medical ethics 1977; (3): (accessed 30 June 2018)
[33] Jason Wasserman, Jeffrey Michael Clair, Ferris J. Ritchey.A Scale to Assess Attitudes toward Euthanasia. 2005. (2018) [Accessed 2 Aug. 2018].
[34] Indian Journal of Palliative Care. (2018). Attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among Pakistani and Indian doctors: A survey.;year=2008;volume=14;issue=2;spage=71;epage=74;aulast=Abbas [Accessed 2 Aug. 2018].
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.