International Journal of Mathematics and Computational Science
Articles Information
International Journal of Mathematics and Computational Science, Vol.1, No.2, Apr. 2015, Pub. Date: Mar. 25, 2015
Seismic Response Control of Buildings Using Base Isolation
Pages: 37-49 Views: 1535 Downloads: 1060
Authors
[01] Gabriel Danila, Technical Sciences Department, Faculty of Architecture, "Ion Mincu" University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, Romania.
Abstract
Among the methods of passive control of buildings, the base isolation method seems to be the most effective. Its efficiency has been proven in the major earthquakes of the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century. The paper presents a comparative study between two seismic isolation systems. The first system is composed of high damping rubber bearings and of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers (HDRB+NFVD) and the second system is composed of friction pendulum bearings with two sliding surfaces (FPB2S). The study showed that the mean response relative displacements and also the base shear forces of the building with two isolation systems have close values. The minimum values of absolute acceleration response are obtained with HDRB+NFVD isolation system. Regarding the dissipated energy, the HDRB+NFVD isolation system dissipates more energy, than the FPB2S isolation system.
Keywords
Friction Pendulum Bearing, High Damping Rubber Bearing, Nonlinear Fluid Viscous Damper, Nonlinear Time-History Analysis
References
[01] Naeim, F., Kelly, J. M. (1997). Design of Seismic Isolated Structures. From Theory to Practice. New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
[02] Shanghai Eagle Bridge Technolgy Co. Ltd. Retrived January 04, 2012, from http://www.se-bt.com/en/index/.
[03] Constantinou, M.C. (2004, October). Technical Report. Friction Pendulum Double Concave Bearing. Retrived January 05, 2012, from http://nees.buffalo.edu/docs/dec304/FP-DC%20Report-DEMO.pdf.
[04] UniversitateaTehnică de ConstrucțiiBucurești. (2006). Cod de proiectareseismică P100: Partea I - Prevederi de proiectarepentruclădiri. P100-1/2006.București.
[05] SeismoArtif [computer software]. (2012). Pavia: SeismoSoftsrl. Available: http://www.seismosoft.com.
[06] European Committee for Standardization. (2004). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Standard. EN 1998-1:2004. Brussels.
[07] Cheng, F., Jiang, H., Lou, K. (2008). Smart Structures. Innovative Systems for Seismic Response Control. Boca Raton, London, New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
[08] Etabs v9.2.0 [computer software]. (2007). Berkeley: Computers and Structures Inc.
[09] SAP2000 v15.1.0 [computer software]. (2011). Berkeley: Computers and Structures Inc.
[10] Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE. 114(8), 1804-1826. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8 (1804).
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2017 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.