Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Articles Information
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol.3, No.2, Mar. 2017, Pub. Date: Aug. 28, 2017
A Case Study of a Rural Senior Cohousing Community with Attention Restoration and Nature
Pages: 9-18 Views: 1093 Downloads: 519
[01] Melissa Lies, Healthcare Interior Design, KKT Architects, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
[02] Mihyun Kang, Department of Design, Housing and Merchandising, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Exposure and interaction with nature provides benefits to individuals, including older adults. The purpose of this study was to examine design features of senior cohousing communities that connect older adults to nature, and explore the connections of the design features with the Attention Restoration Theory. The importance and presence of nature in older adult facilities, especially senior cohousing communities needs to be considered. The Attention Restoration Theory’s components of being away, fascination, extent, and compatibility are observed in senior cohousing communities. The component of being away was found in the design features of the individual home back porches and the labyrinth. Fascination was found in the wild and raised flowers throughout the community and large windows. The component of extent was supported in the design feature of the sidewalks throughout the community and the built handrails and nature trails on the edge of the community. Finally, compatibility was seen in the common garden, compost area, Common House patio, sidewalks and windows. The consideration of nature within the development of facilities for older adults, particularly senior cohousing communities, is valuable and necessary for the quality of life of older adults.
Older Adults, Senior Cohousing Communities, Nature, Attention Restoration Theory
[01] Evans, G. W., & McCoy, J. M. (1998). When buildings don't work: The role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 85-94.
[02] Lui, C., Everingham, J., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009, September). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116-121. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355
[03] Burton, E. J., Mitchell, L., & Stride, C. B. (2011). Good places for aging in place: Development of objective built environment measures for investigating links with older people's wellbeing [Electronic version]. BMC Public Health, 11(839), 1-4. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-839
[04] Durrett, C. (2009). The senior cohousing handbook: a community approach to independent living (2nd Ed.). Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
[05] Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder (2nd ed., pp. 3-36). Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
[06] Greenleaf, A. T., Bryant, R. M., & Pollock, J. B. (2014, June). Nature-based counseling: Integrating the healing benefits of nature into practice. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 36(2), 162-174. doi:10.1007/s10447-013-9198-4
[07] Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.
[08] Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective (pp. 1-197). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[09] Roe, J., & Aspinall, P. (2010). The restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in adults with good and poor mental health [Electronic version]. Health & Place, 17, 103-113. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.09.003
[10] Wells, N. M., & Laquatra, J. (2010). Why green housing and green neighborhoods are important to the health and well-being of older adults. Journal of the American Society on Aging, 33(4), 50-57.
[11] Wagner, L. I., & Cella, D. (2004). Fatigue and cancer: Causes, prevalence and treatment approaches. British Journal of Cancer, 91(5), 822-828. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602012
[12] Ottosson, J., & Grahn, P. (2005). A comparison of leisure time spent in a garden with leisure time spent indoors: On measures of restoration in residents in geriatric care. Landscape Research, 30(1), 23-55. doi:10.1080/0142639042000324758
[13] Soderback, I., Soderstrom, M., & Schalander, E. (2004). Horticultural therapy: The ‘healing garden’ and gardening in rehabilitation measures at Danderyd Hospital Rehabilitation Clinic, Sweden. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 7(4), 245-260. doi:10.1080/13638490410001711416
[14] Sempik, J., Aldridge, J. & Becker, S. (2003). Social and therapeutic horticulture: evidence and messages from research. Thrive with the Centre for Child and Family Research, Loughborough University, Reading.
[15] Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2025). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50. doi:
[16] Zhang, J., Piff, P. K., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Keltner, D. (2014). An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 61-72. doi:
[17] Staats, H., & Hartig, T. (2004). Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 199-211. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.005
[18] Staats, H., Kieviet, A., & Hartig, T. (2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 147-157. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00112-3
[19] Johansson, M., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2011). Psychological benefits of walking: Moderation by company and outdoor environment. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(3), 261-280. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01051.x
[20] Staats, H., Van Germerden, E., & Hartig, T. (2010). Preference for restorative situations: Interactive effects of attentional state, activity-in-environment, and social context. Leisure Sciences, 32, 401-417. doi:10.1080/01490400.2010.510990
[21] Humpel, N., Owen, N., Leslie, E., Marshall, A. L., Bauman, A. E., & Sallis, J. F. (2004, January 21). Associations of location and perceived environmental attributes with walking in neighborhoods. American Journal of Health Promotion.
[22] Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010, November 10). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 3947`-3955. doi:10.1021/es903183r
[23] Korpela, K., Borodulin, K., Neuvonen, M., Paronen, O., & Tyrvainen, L. (2013). Analyzing the mediators between nature-based outdoor. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 1-7. doi:
[24] Choi, J. S. (2004). Evaluation of community planning and life of senior cohousing projects in northern European countries 1. European planning studies, 12(8), 1189-1216.
[25] Glass, A. P. (2009). Aging in a community of mutual support: The emergence of an elder intentional cohousing community in the United States. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 23, 283-303. doi:10.1080/02763890903326970
[26] Sanguinetti, A. (2014). Transformational practices in cohousing: Enhancing residents' connection to community and nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 86-96. doi:
[27] Kang, M., Lyon, M., & Kramp, J. (2015). Senior Cohousing Residential Design Features for Perceived Autonomy. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 258-265. Retrieved March 6, 2016, from
[28] Bamford, G. (2005, March). Cohousing for older people: Housing innovation in the Netherlands and Denmark [Electronic version]. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 24(1), 44-46.
[29] Lorenz, L. S., & Kolb, B. (2009). Involving the public through participatory visual research methods [Electronic version]. Health Expectations, 12, 262-274.
[30] Our Vision and Values. (2015). In Oakcreek Community. Retrieved from
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.