Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Articles Information
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol.5, No.2, Jun. 2019, Pub. Date: Apr. 10, 2019
Teachers’ Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge and Its Practices in Religious and Moral Education (RME) Curriculum in Ghana
Pages: 56-64 Views: 225 Downloads: 194
[01] Solomon Appiah, Department of Art and Social Sciences, Enchi College of Education, Enchi, Ghana.
[02] Joseph Mfum-Appiah, Department of Art and Social Sciences, Enchi College of Education, Enchi, Ghana.
The study was conducted to find out teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge in the teaching of RME in the Aowin District of the Western Region. The descriptive survey was the design. The population included all RME students and teachers in the Aowin District. However, a sample population of 33 RME teachers and 98 students were used for the study through simple random sampling technique. Data was analysed using both descriptive. The data was organized into tables, frequencies, percentages and means in line with the research questions which guided the study. The study revealed concluded that, though teachers have adequate skills in blending technology, pedagogy and content, they seldom put to practice these skills in the classroom. The implication is that, as a nation we are not getting the best out of our teachers. From the conclusion, it is recommended that since teachers seldom put into practice what they have, teacher preparation programmes should provide opportunities for potential teachers to learn more skills in integrating technology, content and pedagogy. It is further recommended that, supervisors in basic schools including head teachers and circuit supervisors should strengthen their supervisory activities on what teachers do in the classroom rather than concentrating on what teachers say they can do or are doing.
Teachers’, Technological, Pedagogical, Content, Knowledge, Practices, Religious and Moral Education, Curriculum, Junior High Schools, Aowin, Municipality, Ghana
[01] Smith, N. (1966). The Presbyterian Church of Ghana, 1833-1960: A younger church in a changing society. Accra: Ghana University Press.
[02] Odamtten, S. K. (1978). The missionary factor in Ghana’s development (1820-1880). Accra: Waterville.
[03] Foster, G. M. (1965). Peasant society and the image of limited good. American Anthropologist, 67 (6), 293–315.
[04] Ministry of Education (2008). Religious and Moral Education Syllabus for Basic Schools. Accra-Ghana: CRDD.
[05] Asare-Danso, S. (2012). Basel mission education in the Gold Coast/Ghana (1950-2007): Effects of education acts on missionary education. Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG.
[06] Appiah, S. (2018). Religious and Moral Education (RME) Teacher’s Technological Content Knowledge Base Impact on Students in Junior High Schools in Ghana. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 1 (3), 241-257.
[07] Martorella, P. (1997). Technology and the social studies or: Which way to the sleeping giant? Theory and Research in Social Education, 25 (4), 511-514.
[08] T-TEL Report (2014-2018). Teaching practice handbook for tutors in colleges of education, Ghana. Accra: Ministry of Education.
[09] Appiah, S., & Mfum-Appiah, J. (2019). An Investigation into Pedagogical Knowledge Practices in Religious and Moral Education (RME) Curriculum in The Selected Junior High Schools (JHSs) In Ghana. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, (at press)
[10] Harris, J. B., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Paper presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL.
[11] Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15 (2), 4-14.
[12] Harris, J. B. (2008). TPACK in in-service education: Assisting experienced teachers plan improvisations. In AACTE Committee on Innovation & Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (Pp. 251-271). New York NY: Routledge.
[13] AACT Committee on Innovation & Technology (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. New York: Routledge.
[14] Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Pre-service elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instruction system design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (4), 292-302.
[15] Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Williams, M. K. (2008 – 2009). The evaluation of the required educational technology course. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25 (2), 67-71.
[16] Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) [diagram]. Retrieved April 13, 2009, from Jpg.
[17] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers’ College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054.
[18] Keller, J. B., Bonk, C. J., & Hew, K. (2005). The TICKIT to teacher learning: Designing professional development according to situative principles. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (4), 329 – 340.
[19] Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2004). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In J. Voogt, & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
[20] Koehler, M., J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49 (3), 740–762.
[21] Archambault, L. M., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 71-88.
[22] Shulman, L. (1992). Ways of seeing, ways of knowing, ways of teaching, ways of learning about teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28 (2), 393-396.
[23] Pecku, N. K. (1998). Teacher education in Ghana: Evolution and prospects. Accra: Elorm Electronics & Business Services.
[24] Griffiths, V., & Owen, P. E. (1995). Schools in partnership: Accreditation of initial teacher training. London: McGraw-Hill.
[25] Fish, D. (2009). Quality mentorship – A principled approach. London: Kogan.
[26] Wragg, E. C. (1993). Primary teaching skills: The report of the research findings of the Leverhulme Primary Project. London: Routledge.
[27] Arends, R. (1994). Learning to teach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[28] Tamakloe, E. K. (1997). An evaluation of the national conference on teacher education (1986). London: The African Books Collective Ltd.
[29] Hoffer, M., & Harris, J. (2011). Learning activity types wiki. Available: College of William & Mary, School of Education, http://activitytype.wmwikis. Net.
[30] Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006) Introducing TPACK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation & Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. New York, NY: Routledge.
[31] Lindroth, M. (2006). Indigenous-state relations in the UN: Establishing the indigeneous forum. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[32] O’Brien, T. (2015). Assessing the impact of teachers’ technology, pedagogy and content knowledge, and beliefs, in a regional vocational education and training context. An unpublished Doctor of Education Thesis submitted to the School of Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.