Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Articles Information
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol.5, No.3, Sep. 2019, Pub. Date: May 31, 2019
Implications of Teachers’ Knowledge of Social Studies Profile Dimensions in Teaching and Learning in Senior High Schools
Pages: 209-221 Views: 188 Downloads: 118
[01] Isaac Eshun, Social Studies Education Department, Faculty of Social Sciences Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana.
[02] David Naya Zuure, Centre for African Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana.
[03] Emmanuel Brew, Social Sciences Department, Enchi College of Education, Enchi, Ghana.
[04] Anthony Bordoh, Social Sciences Department, Enchi College of Education, Enchi, Ghana.
This study was centred on implications of teachers’ knowledge of Social Studies profile dimensions in teaching and learning in the senior high schools in selected districts in Ghana. The objective of the study was to assess the implications of graduate teachers’ knowledge base of Social Studies profile dimensions in the senior high schools. This study adopted a multiple case study design. The data were used together to form one case. The study was carried out in three senior high schools within the Aowin and Wassa Amenfi West Districts in the Western Region of Ghana. The population for the study were the social studies teachers teaching in the Aowin and Wassa Amenfi West Districts. Both the graduate Social Studies teachers and the senior high schools were purposively and conveniently selected for the study. The study employed two instruments for the data collection, namely, interview guide and classroom observation protocol. The findings of the study revealed that: most Social Studies teachers did not have in-depth knowledge about the Social Studies profile dimensions. Also, most of the respondents did not possess both content and subject matter knowledge with respect to Social Studies profile dimensions except few who were directly exposed to the concept of profile dimensions while studying at the University. Based on the above findings, it is recommended that, Social Studies teachers in the senior high schools should study the profile dimensions of the subject to enable them employ its usage in the teaching and learning process so as to achieve the desired goal (s) and objectives of the subject.
Ghana, Profile Dimensions, Senior High Schools, Social Studies, Teachers’ Knowledge, Teaching and Learning
[01] Yasseen, B. M. B. (2010). The effect of teachers' behaviour on students' behaviour in the classroom. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 6 (1), 1-12.
[02] Akhtar, S. (2008). The implementation of education for citizenship in Scotland: Recommendation of approaches for effective practice. Improving Schools, 11 (5), 33-48.
[03] Banks, J. (1990). Teaching strategies for Social Studies. inquiry, valuing, and decision-making. New York: Longman.
[04] Adu-Yeboah, C., Quainoo, T. & Koffie, S. (2012). Methods of teaching environmental and social studies. Anwomanso-Kumasi: Prisebs Business Services.
[05] Lee, E., Brown, M. N., Luft, J. A. & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107, 52-68.
[06] Bordoh, A. (2012). Tutors’ conception and use of formative assessment in social studies in Colleges of Education in the Central Region of Ghana. Published MPhil Thesis, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana.
[07] Bekoe, S. O. & Eshun, I. (2013). Curriculum feuding and implementation challenges: The case of Senior High School (SHS) Social Studies in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 4 (5), 39-45.
[08] Dee, T. S., & Cohodes, S. R. (2008). Out-of-field teachers and student achievement: Evidence from matched-pairs comparison. Public Finance Review, 36, 7-13.
[09] Ananga, E. D., & Ayaaba, D. (2004). Social Studies, educating effective citizens. Dansoman: Asante and Hittscher Printing Press Ltd.
[10] Wilmot, P. F. (1989). Sociology: A new introduction. Worcester: Billing and Sons Ltd.
[11] Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1) 1-22.
[12] Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researchers, 15, 4-14.
[13] Eshun, I. & Mensah, F. M (2013). Investigation of pedagogical content knowledge of graduate social studies teachers in senior high schools in the Western Region of Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 4 (4), 4-5.
[14] Grossman, P. L., & Richert, A. E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 4 (1), 53-62.
[15] Schwab, J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury and N. Wilkof (Eds.), Science curriculum and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 229-272). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[16] King, B. & Newman, F. M. (2000). Will teacher learning advance school goals? Phi Delta Kappan, 81 (8), 576-580.
[17] Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105-1150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
[18] Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). PCK: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome and N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining PCK: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3-20). Boston: Kluwer.
[19] Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 17-30.
[20] Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teacher learning that supports student learning. In B. Z. Presseisen (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence (3rd ed., pp. 91-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
[21] Verloop, N., Van Driel, J. & Meijer, P. (1998). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base for teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441-461.
[22] Barnett, J. & Hodson, D. (2001). PCK: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Teacher Education, 85, 426-453.
[23] Magnusson, S., Krajacik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of PCK for science teaching (pp. 95-120). In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (eds.), Examining PCK: The construct and its implications for science education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
[24] Van Driel, J., Verloop, N. & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695.
[25] Deng, Z. & Luke, A. (2008). Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[26] Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc.
[27] Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press Teachers College Columbia University.
[28] Shubert, W. H. (1992). Personal theorizing about teacher personal theorizing. In E. W. Ross, J. W. Cornett, & G. McCutcheon (Eds.), Teacher personal theorizing: Connecting curriculum practice, theory and research (257-277). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
[29] Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Keyon, L., Ache’r, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B. & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632-654.
[30] Costigen, A. (2005). A “traditional” alternative route to certification: Narrative research and implications for teacher education and retention. In J. Rainer-Dangel and E. M. Guyton, (Eds). Research on alternative and non-traditional education: Teacher education yearbook, XIII.: Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
[31] Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (3), 241-247.
[32] Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Dancing with maggots and saints: Visions for subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and PCK in science teacher education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 27-42.
[33] Bond, L., Smith, T., Baker, W. K. & Hattie, J. A. (2000). The certification system of the national board for professional teaching standards: A construct and consequential validity study. Greensboro, NC: Greensboro centre for educational research and evaluation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
[34] Bryman, A. (2004). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: Prospects and limits. Leicester, England: University of Leicester.
[35] Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[36] Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[37] Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[38] Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[39] Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientist and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
[40] Greeff, M. (2002). Information collection: Interviewing. In A. S. de Vos (Ed.), Research at grass roots (291-320). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
[41] Veal, A. J. (2011). Research methods for leisure and tourism. (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.
[42] Phillimore, J. & Goodson, L. (2004). Qualitative research in tourism. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
[43] Neuman, L. W. (2003). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (5th ed.) New York: Allayn and Bacon.
[44] Veal, A. J. (2006). Research methods for leisure and tourism: A practical guide. (3rd ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall/ Pearson Education.
[45] Curriculum Research and Development Division [CRDD] (2010). Social Studies teaching syllabus for senior high schools. Accra: Ministry of Education.
[46] Quashigah, A. Y., Kankam, B., Bekoe, S. O., Eshun, I., & Bordoh, A. (2015). Teacher-trainees’ varying curriculum conceptions of social studies in the colleges of education (CoE) in Ghana. American Journal of Social Science Research, 1 (3), 125-135.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.