Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Articles Information
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol.5, No.4, Dec. 2019, Pub. Date: Sep. 6, 2019
Sex at Dusk, Sex at Dawn, Selfish Genes: How Old-Dated Evolutionary Ideas Are Used to Defend Fallacious Misogynistic Views on Sex Evolution
Pages: 350-367 Views: 205 Downloads: 351
Authors
[01] Rui Diogo, Department of Anatomy, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
Ryan and Jetha's 2010 book "Sex at Dawn" caused a huge controversy within the academic community, with several papers, commentaries, and even a whole book, "Sex at Dusk: lifting the shiny wrapping from Sex at Dawn" published in 2012 by Saxon, being written to attack it. However, when one reads the so-called 'scientific' publications that were produced after, and as a reaction to, Sex at Dawn, one can see that the major controversy is not really about monogamy vs polygamy, as the general public tends to think, but about our 'sexual nature' being mainly polygynous (1 male having several females) as argued in Sex at Dusk, vs multimale-multifemale (each female and each male having various partners of the other sex) as argued in Sex at Dawn. In other words, both models assume that it is mainly part of our 'human nature' to have a male copulating with several females: what hit the nerve of people, with the publication of Sex at Dawn, is mainly its idea that it is also part of our 'nature' to have a female having the sexual drive/desire to copulate with various males. What is particularly interesting is that Saxon published Sex at Dusk mainly as if it were an analysis of the evolution of sex in humans based on 'accurate', 'deep knowledge' of evolutionary biology, an idea often accepted in the few book reviews published about this book, which considered the book to be a 'scientific rebuttal' of the 'pseudo-science' of Sex at Dawn. However, despite the crucial importance of the subjects debated in these books for discussions on human evolution, and the huge repercussion of these debates for the media and broader public, puzzlingly no publication has examined so far, in detail, if the 'evolutionary framework' followed in Sex at Dusk is truly a reflection of a 'deep knowledge' of current evolutionary ideas. In this paper I will show that a careful analysis of Sex at Dusk shows that the book instead uses old-dated, extremist adaptationist 'selfish genes' evolutionary ideas that were popular 5 decades ago but that have been more and more discarded since then. In fact, Sex at Dusk has nothing new or progressive: it is just one more repetition of misogynistic narratives/just-so stories that have been strongly contradicted by empirical data in the last decades. That is, Sex at Dusk - written exclusively to attack Sex at Dawn, a book precisely aimed to put in question such old-dated, misogynistic tales - just confirms the premonition made in works such as Ackerman's Natural History of Love: that due to a powerful combination of strong biases and the use of antiquated fallacious evolutionary ideas, such narratives will in fact likely not "change very soon".
Keywords
Sex, Polygyny, Polyandry, Polygamy, Monogamy, Primates, Human Evolution, Selfish Genes, Adaptationism, Darwin
References
[01] RYAN, C. & JETHA, C. (2010). Sex at dawn: how we mate, why we stray, and what it means for modern relationships. Harber Collins Publishers, New York.
[02] SAXON, L. (2012). Sex at Dusk: lifting the shiny wrapping from Sex at Dawn. CreateSpace, New York.
[03] ACKERMAN, D. (1994). Natural History of Love. Random House, New York.
[04] BECKERMAN, S. & VALENTINE, P., eds. (2002). Cultures of multiple fathers. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
[05] KELLY, R. L. (1995). The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
[06] DIAMOND, J. (1999). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
[07] REDDY, W. M. (2012). The Making of Romantic Love: Longing and Sexuality in Europe, South Asia & Japan, 900-1200 CE. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[08] COONTZ, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: how love conquered marriage. Penguin Books, New York.
[09] HRDY, S. B. (2009). Mother and others - the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Belknap Press, Cambridge.
[10] HOLLAND, J. (2012). A Brief History of Mysogyny - The World's Oldest Prejudice. Constable & Robinson Ltd., London.
[11] CERELLO, K. & KHOLOUSSY, H., eds. (2016). Domestic Tensions, National Identities - Global Perspectives on Marriage, Crisis, and Nation. Oxford University Press, New York.
[12] VAN SCHAIK, C. & MICHEL, K. (2016). The good book of human nature - an evolutionary reading of the bible. Basic Books, New York City.
[13] BROWNING, F. (2017). The fate of gender: nature, nurture, and the human future. Bloomsbury, New York.
[14] FEILER, B. (2017). The First Love Story - Adam, Even and US. Penguin Press, New York.
[15] FINE, C. (2017). Testosterone Rex - Myths of Sex, Science and Society. W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
[16] FINKEL, E. J. (2017). The All-or-Nothing Marriage - How the Best Marriages Work. Penguin Press, New York.
[17] GREENBLASTT, S. (2017). The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve. W. W. Norton & Company, New Yok.
[18] NELSON, L. H., ed. (2017). Biology and Feminism - a Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[19] TALLIS, F. (2018a). Women are more prepared for love. O Publico 28 May 2018: 14-15.
[20] TALLIS, F. (2018b). The incurable romantic: and other tales of madness and desire. Basic Books, New York.
[21] VALENTINE, P., BECKERMAN, S. & ALES, C. (2017). The Anthropology of Marriage in Lowland South-America: Bending and Breaking the Rules. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
[22] BARASH, D. (2012). Sex at Dusk. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 July 2012.
[23] SAPOLSKY, R. M. (2017). Behave - the biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Press, New York.
[24] PINKER, S. (2011). The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined'. Penguin Books, New York.
[25] HANSON, R. (2012). Sex at Dusk v. Dawn. Overcoming Bias (Blog), 30 August 2012 (http://www.overcomingbias.com/2012/08/sex-at-dusk-v-sex-at-dawn.html).
[26] MAH, K., BINIK, Y. M. (2001). The nature of human orgasm: a critical review of major trends. Clinical Psychological Reviews 21, 823-856.
[27] DAWKINS, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[28] DIOGO, R. (2017). Evolution Driven By Organismal Behavior - a unifying view of life, function, form, trends and mismatches. Springer, New York.
[29] PIGLIUCCI, M. & MULLER, GB, eds. (2010). Evolution - the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge.
[30] KULL, K. (2014). Adaptive evolution without natural selection. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112, 287-294.
[31] JABLONKA, E., LAMB, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions - genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge.
[32] WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[33] WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. (2004). Ryuichi Matsuda: a tribute and a perspective on pan-environmentalism and genetic assimilation. In Environment, development and evolution: toward a synthesis (The Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology) (Hall BK, Pearson RD, Müller GB, eds). A Bradford Book, Massachusetts. p. 109-116.
[34] WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. (2007). Dancing with DNA and flirting with the ghost of Lamarck. Biology & Philosophy 22, 439-451.
[35] LALAND, K. N., ODLING-SMEE, J. & TURNER, S. (2014). The role of internal and external constructive processes in evolution. Journal of Physiology 592, 2413–2422.
[36] LALAND, K. N., ULLER, T., FELDMAN, M. W., STERELNY. K., MULLER, B., MOCZEK, A., JABLONKA, E. & ODLING-SMEE, J. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 282: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1019.
[37] LALAND, K. N., MATTHEWS. B. & FELDMAN, M. W. (2016). An introduction to niche construction theory. Evolutionary Ecology 30, 191–202.
[38] PRUM, R. O (2017). The evolution of beauty - how Darwin's forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world - and us. Doubleday, New York.
[39] GOULD, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap, Harvard.
[40] DORUS, S., EVANS, P. D., WYCKOFF, G. J., CHOI, S. S. & LAHN, B. T. (2004). Rate of molecular evolution of the seminal protein gene SEMG2 correlates with levels of female promiscuity. Nature Genetics 36, 1326-1329.
[41] PUTS, D. A., DAWOOD, K. & WELLING, L. L. M. (2012). Why women have orgasms: an evolutionary analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior 41, 1127-1143.
[42] AL-KRENAWI, A. (2013). Mental health and polygamy: The Syrian case. World Journal of Psychiatry 3, 1-7.
[43] MCBREARTY, S & BROOKS, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution 39, 453-563.
[44] DRISCOLL, C. A. & THOMPSON, J. C. (2018). The origins and early elaboration of projectile technology. Evolutionary Anthropology 27, 30-45.
[45] CHURCH OF ENGLAND. (1844). The Book of common prayer: printed by Whitchurch, March 1549; commonly called The First Book of Edward VI. William Pickering, London.
[46] CALL, V., SUSAN, S. & PEPPER, S. 1995. The Incidence and Frequency of Marital Sex in a National Sample. Journal of Marriage and Family 57, 639–652.
[47] THEISS, J. A. (2016). Frequency of sexual relations in marriage. In Encyclopedia of family studies (Shehan C, ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken. p. 1–5.
[48] SECHIYAMA, K. (2014). Japan, The Sexless Nation. Tokyo Business Today 19 December 2014.
[49] WYLIE, K. (2009). A global survey of sexual behaviours. Journal of Family Reproductive Health 3, 39-49.
[50] BONDENMANN, G., LEDERMANN, T., BLATTNER, D. & GALLUZZO, C. (2006). Associations among everyday stress, critical life events, and sexual problems. Journal of Nervous Mental Diseases 194, 494.
[51] BONDEMANN, G., ATKINS, D., SCHAR, M. & POFFET, V. (2010). The association between daily stress and sexual activity. Journal of Family Psychology 24, 271–279.
[52] HAMILTON L. D. & MESTON, C. M. (2013). Chronic Stress and Sexual Function in Women. Journal of Sexual Medicine 10, 2443-2454.
[53] KINGSBERG, S. A. & JANATA, J. W. (2007). Female sexual disorders: Assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Urology and Clinical N America 34, 497-506.
[54] MCCOOL-MYERS, M., THEURICH, M., ZUELKE, A., KNUETTEL, H. & APFELBACHER, C. (2018). Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms. BMC Womens Health 18, 108.
[55] DARWIN, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. J. Murray, London.
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.