Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Articles Information
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol.7, No.2, Jun. 2021, Pub. Date: May 15, 2021
Examining Relationship Between Social Media and Cross-Cultural World Mindedness Among College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
Pages: 94-99 Views: 997 Downloads: 306
Authors
[01] Renee Buster, Health Promotion and Kinesiology, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, United States.
[02] Elizabeth Wachira, Department of Health and Human Performance, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, United States.
[03] Paul Yeatts, Center for Research Design and Analysis, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, United States.
Abstract
Background: There is a cultural shift happening in which social media has overtaken television as the main source of information, as surveyed of 18- to 24- year-olds. Today, 7 in 10 Americans use social media, an increase of 60% usage since 2005. With the increased usage in social media, it is important to examine the impact it has on society. Objective: This study aims to explore the relationship between social media and cross-cultural world-mindedness. The authors wanted to investigate the degree to which cultural perception was impacted by social media use by addressing social cognitive theory and media systems dependency theory. Specifically, the investigators wanted to assess if the type and amount of social media, or media dependence, influenced cultural world-mindedness. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis examined social media use and dependence, perception of environmental protection, tolerance of diversity, world citizenship, and resource sharing. Results: Results indicated there was a weak, negative relationship between environmental protection and social media use and dependence; a weak, positive relationship between world citizenship and social media use and dependence; and a weak, positive relationship between resource sharing and social media factors. To examine political affiliation differences in world-mindedness, a one-way ANOVA was conducted. Results indicated that overall, group differences were present, F (4, 1183) = 98.40, p <.001, η2 =.25. Based on the effect size (η2), it was apparent that a large effect was present. Post hoc testing using Bonferroni comparisons indicated that republicans were significantly lower in world-mindedness than all other groups, p <.001. Conclusion: The strongest predictor of world-mindedness was political affiliation, with weaker relationships found between social media frequency and environmental protection, world citizenship, and resource sharing. The frequency of social media may be less important than the selection of media messages.
Keywords
Media Systems Dependency Theory (MSDT), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), Cross-cultural World-mindedness, Social Cognition, Social Media
References
[01] Wakefield J. (2016). Social media ‘outstrips TV’ as news source for young people. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36528256
[02] Pew Research Center. (2018). Social media fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/
[03] Bandura A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Media effects (pp. 110-140). Routledge.
[04] Syed-Abdul S, Gabarron E, & Lau A Y (Eds). (2016). Participatory Health Through Social Media. Academic Press.
[05] Velasquez, A. & LaRose, R. (2015). Social media for social change: Social media political efficacy and activism in student activist groups. Journal of Broadcasting and & Electronic Media, 59(3), 456- 474. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2015.1054998
[06] Ball-Rokeach, S. J. & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass- media effects. Communication Research, 3(1), 3- 21. doi: 10.1177/009365027600300101
[07] Mehrad, J. & Yousefi, Z. (2018). Introducing the theory of “media system dependency” with emphasis on its potential application in theoretical framework of researches in the field of information science and knowledge. International Journal of Information Science & Management, 16(1), 1–14.
[08] Meyer, L. & Milligan, A. (2012). World-mindedness and global citizenship. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (Vol. 1, pp. 2316-2319). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781452218533.n728
[09] Jhangiani, R., Tarry, H., & Stangor, C. (2015). Principles of social psychology-1st international edition.
[10] Luqiu, LR., & Yang, F. (2018). Islamophobia in China: news coverage, stereotypes, and Chinese Muslims’ perceptions of themselves and Islam. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(6), 598-619.
[11] Huddy, L., Del Ponte, A., & Davies, C. (2021). Nationalism, Patriotism, and Support for the European Union. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12731
[12] Maharaja, G. (2018). The Impact of Study Abroad on College Students' Intercultural Competence and Personal Development. International Research and Review, 7 (2), 18-41.
[13] Der-Karabetian, A. (2018). Relationship of Sustainable Behavior, World-Mindedness, National and Global Identities, Perceived Environmental Risk and Globalization Impact Among College Students in the United States.
[14] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
[15] Pew Research Center. (2019). The generations defined. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/st_18-02-27_generations_defined/
[16] Clark, A. K. (2017). Updating the gender gap(s): A multilevel approach to what underpins changing cultural attitudes. Politics & Gender, 13 (1), 26-56. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezp.twu.edu/10.1017/S1743923X16000520
[17] Ha, L., Yoon, K., & Zhang, X. (2013). Consumption and dependency of social network sites as a news medium: A comparison between college students and general population. School of Media and Communication Faculty Publications. 11. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/smc_pub/11
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.