Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Articles Information
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol.1, No.3, Jul. 2015, Pub. Date: Jun. 13, 2015
Social Studies Teachers’ Knowledge Base in Authentic Assessment in Selected Senior High Schools in the Central Region of Ghana
Pages: 249-257 Views: 1176 Downloads: 1073
[01] Anthony Bordoh, Department of Art and Social Sciences, Enchi College of Education, Enchi, Ghana.
[02] Isaac Eshun, Department of Art and Social Sciences, Enchi College of Education, Enchi, Ghana.
[03] Ama Mbeaba Quarshie, Department of Art and Social Sciences, Holy Child College of Education, Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana.
[04] Thoephilus Kweku Bassaw, Department of Art and Social Sciences, Komenda College of Education, Komenda, Ghana.
[05] Patrick Kwarteng, Department of Art and Social Sciences, Wiawso College of Education, Sefwi Wiawso, Ghana.
The knowledge base of senior high school teachers’ in authentic assessment will be paramount to both teachers’ students if they are implemented effectively in a social studies classroom. The study used a descriptive case study design. Both the schools and teachers’ were randomly selected from fifty seven (57) government assisted senior high schools in the Central Region of Ghana. The study used ten (10) senior high schools and twenty (20) teachers. Semi structured interviews were the main instruments used for data collection. The results indicated that knowledge in authentic assessment was relatively poor. Clearly, there were noticeable gaps and variations between the teachers’ conceptions and theoretical knowledge of authentic assessment and their relevant practices in the classrooms. It was also discovered that authentic assessment use in the Social Studies classroom was limited by policy systems, time, resources and assessment methods employed by the various schools. It recommended that the teaching universities in Ghana should broaden their scope on the teaching of assessment to incorporate authentic assessment.
Assessment, Authentic Assessment, Social Studies, Authentic Assessment in Social Studies, Senior High Schools
[01] Bassey, M. (2003). Case study research. In J. Swann & J. Pratt (Eds.) Educational research in practice: Making sense of methodology. London: Continuum. Pp. 111-123.
[02] Baumann, J. F., Hoffman, J. V., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Moon Ro, J. (2000). “The First R” yesterday and today: U.S. elementary reading instruction practices reported by teachers and administrators. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3): 338-377
[03] Bekoe, S. O., Eshun, I., & Bordoh, A. (2013). Formative assessment techniques tutors use to assess teacher-trainees’ learning in Social Studies in Colleges of Education in Ghana. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 20-30.
[04] Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2005). Redesigning assessment for learning beyond higher education. In A. Brew, and C. Asmar, C. (Eds.), Research and Development in Higher Education, 28, 34-41.
[05] Brooks, V. (2001). Assessment in secondary schools: The new teachers guide to monitoring, assessment, recording, reporting and accountability. Burkingham: Open University
[06] Brualdi, A. (1998). Implementing performance assessment in the classroom. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 6(2). Retrieved: 28-04-11. getvn. asp
[07] CRDD (2010). Social Studies syllabus for Senior Secondary Schools. Accra: Ministry of Education.
[08] Cohen L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007) Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
[09] Craddock, D., & Mathias, H. (2009). Assessment options in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 127-140.
[10] Cumming, J., & Maxwell, G. (1999). Contextualising authentic assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policies and Practices, 6(2), 177 – 194.
[11] Danielson, C. (1997). Designing successful performance tasks and rubrics. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[12] Davies, A., Herbst-Luedtke, S., & Reynolds, B. (2008). Leading the way to making classroom assessment work. Courtenay, BC: Connections Publishing Inc.
[13] Darling-Hammond, L & Pecheone, R., (2009). Reframing Accountability: Using Performance Assessments to Focus Learning on Higher Order Skills. In Lyndsay Pinkus (ed). Measuring Performance in High School. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education, 2009.
[14] Dietel, R. J., Herman, J. L., & Knuth, R. A. (1991). What does research say about assessment? NCREL,OakBrook.Availableonline:
[15] Eubanks, D. A. (2009). A case study of authentic assessment. In C. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education. Hershey, USA: Information Science Reference.
[16] Gulikers, J., Kester, L., Kirschner, P., & Bastiaens, T. (2008). The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction. 18, 172 –186.
[17] Kankam, B., Bordoh, A., Eshun, I., Bassaw, T. K., & Korang, F. Y. (2014). Teachers’ perception of authentic assessment techniques practice in social studies lessons in Senior High Schools in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Research and Information Science. 1(4), 62-68.
[18] Law, B., & Eckes, M. (1995). Assessment and ESL. Manitoba, Canada. Peguis Publishers.
[19] Lund, J. L. (1997). Authentic assessment: Its development and applications. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance (JOPERD), 68(7), 25-28.
[20] Lunn, J. (2006). A study on teacher professionalism and teacher leadership: The teachers’ viewpoint. (Master’s Thesis, University of Waikato, 2006), Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved: 20-12-2008.
[21] Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
[22] McMillan, J. H. (2001). Classroom assessment: Principals and practice for effective instruction (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[23] Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N. & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC.: National Academic Press.
[24] Raison, G., & Pelliccione, L. (2006). Aligning assessment practices with long term outcomes in higher education. Paper presented at the Evaluations and Assessment Conference 2006: Enhancing Student Learning.
[25] Reeves, T. C. (2000). “Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education.” Educational Computing Research, 3(1) 101-111.
[26] Rudner, L. M., & Schaffer, W. D. (Eds.). (2002). “What teachers need to know about assessment.” National Educational Association, Washington, DC.
[27] Sadler, D. R. (2009). “Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Retrieved: 04-09-2009.
[28] Shepard, (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed).Washington: AERA.
[29] Simonson M., Smaldino, S, Albright, M. and Zvacek, S. (2000). Assessment for distance education (chapter 11). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[30] Sternberg, R. J. (2007). “Assessing what matters.” Educational Leadership, 65 (4) 20-26.
[31] Torrance, H. (1995). “The role of assessment in educational reform.” In H. Torrance (Ed.), Evaluating authentic assessment: problems and possibilities in new approaches to assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
[32] Warman, J. (2002). Authentic assessment: A systematic review of the research. Masters Thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto. Retrieved: 10-6-12 (UMI. Proquest Digital Dissertation).
[33] Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Washington, DC: Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation. (ERIC Digest, EDRS No. ED 328 606).
[34] Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessing student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
[35] Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
[36] Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Wood, A. M., & Joseph, S. (2007). Grand theories of personality cannot be integrated. American Psychologist, 62, 57–58.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2017 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.